We get better only by doing

-

Hardly will you master a thing by thinking about it.

Oh! No, I should say it is impossible to master a thing by thinking about it. You have got to be doing that thing on a continuum, except what you want to master is the Art of Thinking.

While I do not necessarily believe the principle of 10,000 hours has made popular by Malcolm Gladwell, I do agree for a fact you've got to get your hands dirty if you will ever master a thing.

We get better only by doing

Remember Thomas Edison
Remember Tony Heish
Remember Eric Ries
Remember Abraham Lincoln
Remember the host of your heroes and heroines, they attained only by commitment and consistency.

Get better by doing, not by thinking.
Theory without Practice is barren.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lessons of leadership from Art of War by Sun Tzu

-
The subject of leadership is a perennial long subject of puzzle, there is no one acceptable definition for leadership for all situation, there is no one set of leadership principles for all situation and to everyone, if asked will have an opinion of leadership. Suffice me to say also that the subject of leadership has gone through a lot of empirical studies that have produced concepts like 7 attributes of an effective leader, Inclusive leadership, and irrefutable attributes of an outstanding leader among others. The ancient Chinese war strategy book; Art of War offers another interesting perspective on leadership from a military standpoint which I found relevant to leadership at all levels. It defines leadership as a matter of intelligence, trustworthiness, humaneness, courage, and sternness. In my opinion, this by far a more encompassing definition of leadership you will ever come across. A leader should have all these 5 virtues if s/he will indeed be a leader over the led. "...
Read more

Everyone talks about technology taking on our job: is that really so?

-
What might be an unpopular opinion is that's not going to be the case. Yes, technology will not take our job. What we will rather experience is a shift in job distribution. What do I mean? There is a sense in which at the advent of every technological breakthrough we tend to have this period of fear about what and what the future will look like, and many times it always tends towards the human at disadvantage. At the same time flipping through the pages of history we realize that that has never been the case, we only go through a shift in distribution. Shift in distribution A typical supply/demand curve only experience a shift when factors that were beforehand held constant refuses to remain constant in the interplay of things. So also is it about our jobs, as demand or supply (measured on a macro level with GDP) they will always be there and what we do is only what is changing, hence a shift. We will always have something to do but how we do it and what we do w...
Read more

Thinking well

-
These days, I reference a lot of domain and consider intersections of domains while thinking, talking and writing. It occurred to me at a time to then ask the question what exactly am I? My answer was not far fetched. I am everything I need to be in order to achieve the dreams I have set out to pursue. Yes, I mean that in all ramifications, depth and breadth. The divide created by schooling; Accounting, Psychology, Engineering and so on were created to create a framework through which the mind can think and articulate not to dictate what the mind must think on. (Read that again) In reality, there is a convergence of all knowledge. This convergence comes more often than not at the first principles level. Fundamentally, the human being is a social animal craving social acceptance. Technology created a global social world, where communication which is key to being human is fostered and encouraged. To achieve this, Machine learning models were created which encapsulates the fundamental ps...
Read more